What are the problems with having a larger excess?
The problem with taking on a larger excess is you could find you have to pay it yourself anyway.
#1 – Tenants often don’t pay
Let’s say a tenant causes damage to your property. The insurance company pays out some money, and the tenant has to pay the excess ($2,500).
Most tenants don’t have $2,500 just sitting in the bank.
So who pays? Well if you want to fix the damage ... you do, otherwise the work doesn’t get done.
Yes, tenants might be liable for the excess, but that doesn’t mean they’ll be able to pay it, especially not immediately.
So when something goes wrong, you, the landlord, could be the one covering the cost upfront.
Sure, the tenant might agree to repay you in instalments of $10 a week, but you’re the one who has to stump up the cash in the meantime. Whereas if you had a smaller excess, not only is the tenant more likely to pay, but if you do have to pay it, it doesn’t hurt so much.
#2 – The damage is sometimes less than the excess
A lot of investors don’t end up claiming on insurance because the damage doesn’t meet the excess threshold.
For example, let’s say your excess is $1,000. Your tenant scratches the floors, and the repair quote comes back at $800.
Insurance won’t cover it. They (or more likely you) are the one footing the full bill.
If this happens more than once a year, those “premium savings” vanish fast.