
Property Investment
What should my retirement plan look like?
Thinking about retirement? The Epic Guide to Retirement Planning is the guide that will give you the knowledge so you can plan for your retirement in 2023
Property Investment
6 min read
Author: Nefe Teare
Financial adviser at Opes. Formerly a senior adviser at one of NZ largest investment firms. Owned 3 properties by 30.
Reviewed by: Laine Moger
Journalist and Property Educator, holds a Bachelor of Communication (Honours) from Massey University.
It costs almost $1 million to retire comfortably in New Zealand.
But the average Kiwi spends more money than they earn, according to Stats NZ.
That’s why a lot of Kiwis plan to downsize their houses to pay for retirement.
The idea is simple, once the kids have moved out, sell the family home. Buy a cheaper house. And live off the difference.
But many New Zealanders end up with less money than they thought.
In this article, you'll learn the pros and cons of downsizing. When it works ... when it doesn’t, and how much you can really count on it.
Don’t bank your retirement on selling the family home. Downsizing can work, but most Kiwis end up with far less than they expect.
Downsizing can be part a strategy to pay for your retirement.
As couples have children, they often need a larger house. But, as those children leave the nest, you often don’t need as much space.
So when you downsize you:
Since most of New Zealanders wealth is in housing, this can make sense.
But in practice, it’s rarely that simple.
Before we get into the times downsizing works, let’s go through the times when downsizing fails:
It costs money to sell a house. You need to pay for real estate agents, lawyers, repairs, and marketing. It all chips away.
What looks like a potential $1 million “profit” might end up being tens of thousands less after these costs.
For instance, at Opes we often say that it costs about 5% of your home’s value to sell it.
Let’s say you have a $1 million house with a $200k mortgage. By the time you sell it, and pay all the costs, you might have $750k left.
If it costs you $600k to buy a new house, you’ve got $150,000 left. Not bad. But, also not huge.
Only about 1 in 10 older sellers are left with more than $200k once all the costs were covered, research suggests.
A common trap Kiwis fall into is buying a smaller house ... but one with a high price.
That’s because as you age, you typically want a house that is “easier care”. That typically means buying a newer property.
And newer properties tend to cost a bit more. Because, they aren’t as worn out.
One couple I know lived in a posh suburb in Auckland. They wanted to sell their $1.8 million family home and buy a newer smaller house. The trouble is that all of those homes in their area also cost $1.8 million.
Sometimes retirees will sell a $1 million house and move into a $1 million apartment. So you might not come out with much left over money.
A New Zealand study found that for many older homeowners, who sold and bought again, they had little money left over. Some even spent more.
There aren’t that many genuinely downsizer-friendly homes available.
The Retirement Commission has flagged the housing stock simply isn’t built for older people. That's why many struggle to downsize.
Over the 10 years to 2023, one-bedroom homes made up less than 10% of New Builds.
During that same period, one-person households increased by 120,000. But the supply of one-bedroom homes rose by only 40,000.
So even if you want to downsize, the right homes may not exist where you want to live.
Moving isn’t just a financial decision; it’s emotional and logistical.
You’ll likely have memories in your family home.
And if you’ve been there for years, you’re comfortable. So there needs to be a good enough house for you to move into (that makes it worth it).
As people age, their willingness (and ability) to move goes down. By the time you’re in your 70s, most homeowners tend to stay put unless forced.
Research shows that even though homeowners intend to downsize “someday,” ... they usually don't until something forces the move. That's events like illness, or financial hardship .... not careful financial planning.
What happens if you rely on downsizing to pay for your retirement, but you never move? You typically won’t be able to spend as much as you planned to.
That could mean less travel or comfort, compared to what you thought you would have.
That’s not to say that downsizing never works. Now let’s talk about the times it can work well.
Downsizing can still make sense. It can work well for a lot of people. Here’s when it tends to succeed.
If you’re free and clear of your mortgage, you’re more likely to have enough wealth to make downsizing worthwhile.
Let’s say you have a $1 million property. You sell it, and pay the real estate agent and lawyers. Then you buy a $600,000 property.
If you had no mortgage, you’d be left with $350,000. If you had a $200k mortgage, you’d be left with $150,000.
If your current home is worth a lot of money and you can comfortably buy a lower-value property – downsizing can be a great idea.
I know an investor who own a $15 million house (it’s a VERY nice house). Their retirement plan is to sell it and move to a $5 million house.
It will free up millions of dollars and is genuine downsizing.
But if you’re selling a $1 million house and buying for $800k, there’s not quite as much left once all the fees are paid.
Now that doesn’t mean you need to own a $15m house. Not many people do. That’s where switching cities could make sense.
Often, the biggest gains from downsizing come when you move to a region (or suburb) where house prices are cheaper.
Let’s say you sell your house in Auckland and move to Te Kuiti (a small town in the Waikato).
House prices are substantially cheaper in Te Kuiti vs Auckland. So if you sell the average house in Auckland and buy further south you might come away with an extra $500k (all things being equal).
Though of course, moving city can sometimes mean leaving friends, family and the activities you enjoy behind.
Timing matters. Research shows that if you stay in your family home after you hit 72, you are much less likely to move at all.
That’s because it’s physically and psychologically harder to move.
So you typically stay until you are forced to move (either for health or for financial reasons).
Things like retirement villages an offer a form of downsizing.
Though keep in mind, they come with deferred management fees and exit charges ... so they’re not always a financial win for your decedents.
Across NZ, around 53,000 older people live in 470 retirement villages. But only about 6% of people aged 65+ choose this option.
The University of Auckland found that retirement villages are growing more popular. But, they’re not the mainstream way people downsize.
Downsizing can work…but only when the circumstances line up.
For many, the cash you’re left with is far smaller than expected.
That’s largely because of costs, a limited supply of suitable homes, and the emotional/physical barriers that stop people from moving.
The Retirement Commission found that many Kiwis plan to unlock the equity in their homes. But, they don’t have a realistic gameplan for how to do it.
In other words, your home gives you security, but not always spendable income.
That’s why many investors I work with don’t include downsizing in their wealth plan.
In stead they treat it as a bonus. If it comes long, that’s good. But their retirement plan isn’t relying on it.
Financial adviser at Opes. Formerly a senior adviser at one of NZ largest investment firms. Owned 3 properties by 30.
Nefe is a Registered Financial Adviser at Opes Partners with 7 years’ experience in financial services. Before joining Opes, she was a senior adviser at one of New Zealand’s largest investment firms, managing $13 million in KiwiSaver and managed funds. She’s helped clients invest over $26 million in property and owned 3 properties before her 30th birthday.